Academic scholars and practitioners uniformly suggest that off-premise signs such as billboards will be more effective if they are installed in high-traffic areas rather than low-traffic areas. In this research, we question the ubiquity of this claim and illustrate potential advantages of installing off-premise signs in low-traffic areas given that these environments also tend to be less cluttered (i.e., having fewer competing signs). Across two studies, we provide converging evidence that consumers evaluate a billboard more favorably when it is displayed by itself than when it is displayed next to other billboards. We show that the same billboard in a low-clutter (vs. high-clutter) location is judged to be more aesthetic, which in turn improves the overall evaluation of the billboard. We further delineate boundary conditions in which the benefits of a low-clutter environment are attenuated.
Location, Location, Location
2021
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|COVER FEATURE - AIRPORTS: LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION
Online Contents | 1998
|ENGINE SERVICE & REPAIR - Location, Location, Location
Online Contents | 2012
Pipeline location: location surveys
Engineering Index Backfile | 1961
Perfectly positioned in Panama MIT - location, location, location
British Library Online Contents | 2001