The remarks by professor Weidmann concern: (1) Trip booking (discussed in III); The unmanageable number of O/D-relations (discussed in I); (2) Relations with other PTmodalities (discussed in II); (3) Capacity (see I and Profile paper: ‘State of art of fast transport by buses’); (4) Political feasibility (discussed in V and VI); (5) Speed (discussed in II) and (6) Infrastructure (discussed in II, VI and VII). The remarks of professor Bookhuis concern: (1) FTR as an alternative for car travelling (discussed in IV) and (2) Opportunities (discussed in VII). The author thanks professor Brookhuis and professor Weidmann for their interesting and stimulating remarks.
Response by Prof. Joop Evers
2007
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Discussion note by Prof. Joop Evers: Profile of new intercity transport
DOAJ | 2007
|Is JOOP of only academic interest?
Online Contents | 2006
|JOOP VERROEN, VAKBONDSLEIDER IN DE HAVEN
Online Contents | 1995
British Library Online Contents | 2006
Online Contents | 2011
|