Recently, Kannan et al. [2018] proposed several logit regularization methods to improve the adversarial robustness of classifiers. We show that the computationally fast methods they propose - Clean Logit Pairing (CLP) and Logit Squeezing (LSQ) - just make the gradient-based optimization problem of crafting adversarial examples harder without providing actual robustness. We find that Adversarial Logit Pairing (ALP) may indeed provide robustness against adversarial examples, especially when combined with adversarial training, and we examine it in a variety of settings. However, the increase in adversarial accuracy is much smaller than previously claimed. Finally, our results suggest that the evaluation against an iterative PGD attack relies heavily on the parameters used and may result in false conclusions regarding robustness of a model.


    Zugriff

    Download


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Logit Pairing Methods Can Fool Gradient-Based Attacks


    Beteiligte:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2018


    Anmerkungen:

    Accepted to NeurIPS 2018 Workshop on Security in Machine Learning


    Medientyp :

    Preprint


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Adversarial Logit Pairing

    Kannan, Harini / Kurakin, Alexey / Goodfellow, Ian | ArXiv | 2018

    Freier Zugriff

    Logit Regression

    Retherford, Robert D. / Choe, Minja Kim | Wiley | 1993



    Fool type left-right universal brake

    XIAO YIFU | Europäisches Patentamt | 2021

    Freier Zugriff

    The pulpit-Fool. A satyr

    Dunton, John | TIBKAT | 1707