Purpose: In the transportation sector, reducing vehicle weight is a cornerstone strategy to improve the fuel economy and energy efficiency of road vehicles. This study investigated the environmental implications of lightweighting two automotive parts (Ford Taurus front end bolster, Chevrolet Trailblazer/GMC Envoy assist step) using glass-fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) instead of steel alloys. Methods: The cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments (LCAs) for these studies consider a total service life of 150,000 miles for two applications: a 46 % lighter GFRP bolster on the 2010 Ford Taurus that replaced the 2008 steel and GFRP bolster, and a 51 % lighter GFRP running board for the 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer/GMC Envoy that replaced the previous steel running board including its polymer fasteners. The life cycle stages in these critically reviewed and ISO-compliant LCA studies include the production of upstream materials and energy, product manufacturing, use, and the end-of-life treatment for all materials throughout the life cycle. Results and discussion: The results show that the lighter GFRP products performed better than the steel products for global warming potential and primary energy demand for both case studies. In addition, the GFRP bolster performed better for acidification potential. The savings of fuel combustion and production during the use stage of a vehicle far outweigh the environmental impacts of manufacturing or end-of-life. An even greater benefit would be possible if the total weight reduction in the vehicle would be high enough to allow for the reduction of engine displacement or an elongation of gear ratio while maintaining constant vehicle dynamics. These so-called secondary measures allow the fuel savings per unit of mass to be more than doubled and are able to offset the slightly higher acidification potential of the GFRP running board which occurs when only the mass-induced fuel savings are considered. Conclusions: The lightweight GFRP components are shown to outperform their steel counterparts over the full life cycle mainly due to the reduced fuel consumption of the vehicle in the use phase. To harvest the benefits of light weighting to their full extent, it is recommended that the sum of all mass reductions in the design process be monitored and, whenever feasible, invested into fuel economy by adapting the drive train while maintaining constant vehicle performance rather than leveraging the weight reduction to improve vehicle dynamics.
Life cycle assessment of automotive lightweighting through polymers under US boundary conditions
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment ; 19 , 3 ; 538-545
2014
8 Seiten
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
umweltfreundliche Konstruktion , Kraftstoffeinsparung , Lebenszyklusbewertung , Polymer , faserverstärkter Kunststoff , Lebenszeit , Stahllegierung , Straßenfahrzeug , Treibhauspotenzial , Fahrzeuggewicht , Primärenergie , Fahrzeugbauteil , Randbedingung , Gewichtsverringerung , Umweltbeeinflussung , Kraftstoffverbrauch , Massenverringerung , Antriebsstrang
SAE Technical Papers | 2021
|Primer on automotive lightweighting technologies
TIBKAT | 2021
|Life-Cycle Analysis of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Review
Springer Verlag | 2021
|Cost-effective solutions to automotive lightweighting
TIBKAT | 1992
|Magnesium for Automotive Lightweighting: Status and Challenges
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2019
|