This work looks at two different Design of Experiments methods for defining an operating window in the sheet metal stamping process. The first involves the use of replicates at the different experimental points while the second is a nonreplicated method. The two methods are compared by looking at the relationship results produced and the indication of variation in the process. It is found that the results from both methods are very similar. However the replicated method provides a greater level of confidence in the results. In the stamping process where performing large numbers of replicates is expensive in both time and money the nonreplicated method provides a cost effective way of understanding the process.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Identifying variation in sheet metal stamping


    Beteiligte:
    Doolan, M.C. (Autor:in) / Kalyanasundaram, S. (Autor:in) / Hodgson, P. (Autor:in) / Cardew-Hall, M. (Autor:in)


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1999


    Format / Umfang :

    8 Seiten, 5 Bilder, 3 Tabellen, 5 Quellen



    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Development of FEM for Sheet Metal Stamping

    Nakamachi, Eiji / Wagoner, Robert H. | SAE Technical Papers | 1988


    Drawbeads in sheet metal stamping - a review

    Xu,S.G. / Bohn,M.L. / Weinmann,K.J. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1997


    Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Stamping - A Review

    Weinmann, K. J. / Bohn, M. L. / Xu, S. G. | SAE Technical Papers | 1997


    Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Stamping - A Review

    Xu, S. G. / Bohn, M. L. / Weinmann, K. J. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996


    Development of FEM for sheet metal stamping

    Nakamachi,E. / Wagoner,R.H. / Ohio State Univ.,US | Kraftfahrwesen | 1988