Abstract In cooperative automated driving, the task of lateral and longitudinal vehicle control can be shared by driver and automation. However, conflicting action intentions of the two partners could arise, which need to be resolved within limited time. This can be achieved through structured multimodal negotiation, called arbitration. In order to explore intuitive interaction patterns for arbitration situations, insights from human-human interaction might be transferred. Accordingly, in a field study, couples holding hands or walking arm in arm were videotaped and interviewed when a conflict concerning motion control has been observed. The analysis of the data shows that conflict situations concerning velocity and/or direction of movement occur in natural human-human interaction and that these types of conflict can be dependent on each other. Furthermore, partners use different interaction resources to successfully solve these situations. Results are transferred to cooperative automated driving and an example of an interaction pattern is presented.
Learning from the Best – Naturalistic Arbitration for Cooperative Driving
2017-06-24
12 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Arbitration , Human-machine cooperation , Human systems integration , Automated driving , Cooperative movement , Cooperative guidance and control Engineering , Transportation Technology and Traffic Engineering , User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction , Robotics and Automation , Computational Intelligence
Cooperative Safety Based on Naturalistic Driving Data
ASCE | 2022
|Driving Style Clustering using Naturalistic Driving Data
Transportation Research Record | 2019
|Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Data
Transportation Research Record | 2008
|