Commercially available large-scale consumer surveys such as JD Power and Associates (JDPA) APPEAL Survey are often used to assess the success or failure of seat comfort design. Because access to the raw data from these surveys is limited, mean values are often the sole basis for analysis and comparison. Mean values alone, however, incompletely describe customer ratings that often lead to incorrect interpretation of the data. This can result in organizations expending capital to fix problems that do not exist. Since most companies have limited access to the raw data, this paper examines statistical and psychological factors that affect consumer survey results and describes methods for using these relationships to better interpret results of large scale, industry surveys.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Alternative Statistical and Psychological Methods for Interpreting Large-scale Seat Comfort Surveys


    Weitere Titelangaben:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Beteiligte:

    Kongress:

    SAE World Congress & Exhibition ; 2009



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2009-04-20




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Seat Comfort

    Fukuda, H. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    Seat comfort

    Lee,J. / Ferraiuolo,P. / Ford Motor,US | Kraftfahrwesen | 1993


    Seat Comfort

    Lee, Janilla / Ferraiuolo, Paul | SAE Technical Papers | 1993


    Redefining Seat Comfort

    Shen, W. / Vertiz, A. M. / Society of Automotive Engineers | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    Benchmarking Seat Comfort

    Runkle, Virginia A. | SAE Technical Papers | 1994