To access, purchase, authenticate, or subscribe to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.005 When should leaders announce policies that create net benefits for organizations, but also restrict individual member choices? We find that restrictive policies engender more support from stakeholders when they are to be implemented in the distant versus near future (Studies 1 and 2). We find similar results when manipulating construal level instead of temporal distance (Study 3). The effect of temporal distance on attitudes toward a policy is mediated by people's attention to different aspects of the policy (desirability vs. feasibility, pros vs. cons, self vs. other) (Study 4). Furthermore, temporal distance enhances support for policies that are high, but not low, in desirability for the collective (Study 5). The evidence is consistent with Construal Level Theory; we also consider Rational Choice Theory as an alternative perspective. Our findings suggest that leaders who wish to maximize member support for restrictive policies should consider announcing them well in advance of their implementation date.
It's about time: Divergent evaluations of restrictive policies in the near and distant future
2017
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
DEPARTMENTS - Publisher's Page - It's About Cars; It's About time
Online Contents | 2001
Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance
Online Contents | 2013
|Hindsight bias redefined: It’s about time
Online Contents | 2009
|SAE Technical Papers | 1972
|Hindsight bias redefined: It’s about time
Online Contents | 2009
|