Extended mission budgets fund a significant part of our community, particularly young scientists who in a relatively short time are exposed to a broad range of experiences and opportunities available in space science and other STEM fields. In particular, mission-funded science offers a relatively stable funding stream that enables meaningful mentoring efforts and interactions, including apprenticeships ranging from project management, to mission operations, to data processing and analysis, to hardware and software development, to STEM-related education and outreach. It moreover provides professional contacts that fuel diversity in mission leadership and in the science and technical workforce at-large. Last but not least, it sustains the scientific productivity of NASA’s missions, which constitute major national investments meriting their full exploitation. Budgets cuts, however, are exercising pressure on the science and operations of the extended mission fleet despite being only a small portion of the overall Division budget. The history of Heliophysics has demonstrated that maintaining the operation of missions beyond their prime phase invariably leads to a much deeper knowledge of the original mission science goals, together with new applications often not foreseen during their original design. Their operation as part of the Heliophysics System Observatory (HSO)---a coordinated, 1eliophysics, multipoint observing system of the heliosphere, is a prime example. Some of the first activities undertaken by the Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter missions required recreating the larger context of their new observations by using the diversity of HSO mission capabilities. The marginal cost of maintaining this valuable, working science resource, in the form of both continuing high quality data access and expertise, is small compared to the cost of the original missions or of new missions to achieve similar objectives, making the operation of extended missions, the best “science per dollar” investment in Heliophysics. We argue that reducing both extended mission operations and science budgets will have a ripple effect across the community, including reducing employment and training opportunities for young scientists, to lowering the quality/impact of the Heliophysics Systems Observatory. Instead, we suggest that the proposal process for mission extension should be re-examined. We offer several ideas for reducing costs of extended missions toward maintaining science output and streamlining the management process.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Ideas on the NASA Senior Review and Mission Extension Process


    Beteiligte:
    A. Vourlidas (Autor:in) / J. Luhmann (Autor:in) / T. Kucera (Autor:in) / C.M.S. Cohen (Autor:in) / R.A. Howard (Autor:in) / L. Jian (Autor:in) / C. Lee (Autor:in) / N. Lugaz (Autor:in) / B.E. Wood (Autor:in)

    Kongress:

    Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033 ; 2022 ; Virtual, US



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2022-10-03


    Medientyp :

    Sonstige


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Reliability Estimation for Mission Extension NASA Approach/Recommendations

    T. DiVenti / J. Leitner / N. Lindsey et al. | NTIS | 2019


    Reliability Estimation for Mission Extension NASA Approach/Recommendations

    DiVenti, Tony / Leitner, Jesse / Lindsey, Nancy et al. | NTRS | 2019


    NASA at 50 : interviews with NASA senior leadership

    Wright, Rebecca / Johnson, Sandra / Dick, Steven J. et al. | TIBKAT | 2012



    NASA at 50 : interviews with NASA senior leadership

    USA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration | SLUB | 2012