The goal of the new NASA Aviation Safety Program (AvSP) is to reduce the civil aviation fatal accident rate by 80% in ten years and 90% in twenty years. This program is being driven by the accident data with a focus on the most recent history. Pilot error is the most commonly cited cause for fatal accidents (up to 70%) and obviously must be given major consideration in this program. While the greatest source of pilot error is the loss of situation awareness , mode confusion is increasingly becoming a major contributor as well. The January 30, 1995 issue of Aviation Week lists 184 incidents and accidents involving mode awareness including the Bangalore A320 crash 2/14/90, the Strasbourg A320 crash 1/20/92, the Mulhouse-Habsheim A320 crash 6/26/88, and the Toulouse A330 crash 6/30/94. These incidents and accidents reveal that pilots sometimes become confused about what the cockpit automation is doing. Consequently, human factors research is an obvious investment area. However, even a cursory look at the accident data reveals that the mode confusion problem is much deeper than just training deficiencies and a lack of human-oriented design. This is readily acknowledged by human factors experts. It seems that further progress in human factors must come through a deeper scrutiny of the internals of the automation. It is in this arena that formal methods can contribute. Formal methods refers to the use of techniques from logic and discrete mathematics in the specification, design, and verification of computer systems, both hardware and software. The fundamental goal of formal methods is to capture requirements, designs and implementations in a mathematically based model that can be analyzed in a rigorous manner. Research in formal methods is aimed at automating this analysis as much as possible. By capturing the internal behavior of a flight deck in a rigorous and detailed formal model, the dark corners of a design can be analyzed. This paper will explore how formal models and analyses can be used to help eliminate mode confusion from flight deck designs and at the same time increase our confidence in the safety of the implementation. The paper is based upon interim results from a new project involving NASA Langley and Rockwell Collins in applying formal methods to a realistic business jet Flight Guidance System (FGS).


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    A Formal Methods Approach to the Analysis of Mode Confusion


    Beteiligte:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2004-01-01


    Medientyp :

    Sonstige


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Mode Confusion Analysis of a Flight Guidance System Using Formal Methods

    Joshi, A. / IEEE / AIAA | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003


    Mode confusion analysis of a flight guidance system using formal methods

    Joshi, A. / Miller, S.P. / Heimdahl, M.P.E. | IEEE | 2003


    Formal Extensions to the Intent-Based Mode Confusion Detection Framework

    Suraj Nandiganahalli, Jayaprakash / Lyu, Hao / Hwang, Inseok | AIAA | 2015


    Intent-based Abstraction for Formal Verification of Flight Deck Mode Confusion

    Suraj Nandiganahalli, Jayaprakash / Lee, Sangjin / Hwang, Inseok | AIAA | 2016


    An Approach for Eliminating Mode Confusion

    Mumaw, R. J. / Flight Safety Foundation / International Federation of Airworthiness et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002