The rapid increase of space activity in the 21st century has raised questions about the adequacy of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST) to govern orbital activities and prevent future international conflicts. This thesis analyzes the OST's ability to address critical emerging problems across three issue areas: orbital space debris, the weaponization of space, and asteroid and Moon mining. It concludes by arguing that the language within the OST does not adequately address these emerging problems, which could lead to possible conflicts in each of these issue-areas. This thesis offers several possible policy recommendations for consideration by U.S. decision makers to promote a future framework of stability and longevity in the use of space: 1) transfer responsibility for tracking non-military satellites and space debris in LEO from the military to commercial space companies; 2) review the current 25-year guideline for de-orbiting satellites for adequacy; 3) propose a moratorium to China and Russia on further ASAT testing; 4) prohibit nefarious behavior in space, rather than trying to prohibit dual-use technologies; 5) initiate talks with Russia and China to reevaluate and discuss the Moon Treaty; and 6) reach out to interested State Parties in the OST to coordinate future space mining legislation.
Can the Outer Space Treaty Prevent Conflicts in Orbit in the 21st Century
2018
193 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
IN-ORBIT SERVERS: DOES THE OUTER SPACE TREATY HAVE SPACE?
TIBKAT | 2021
|Avoiding 21st Century Societal and Regional Conflicts
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|Earth-to-orbit propulsion for the 21st century
NTRS | 1989
|Cologne Commentary on Space Law (Vol. 1): Outer Space Treaty
Elsevier | 2011
|