In evaluating the budget requests, we examined (1) production plans, delivery plans, improvement plans, and effectiveness analyses to determine whether planned production was warranted; (2) test reports and missile delivery status to evaluate the effect of production problems on missile delivery; and (3) the requirements for selected missiles and support equipment. In addition, we reviewed selected aspects of missile costs by (1) examining the service's methodology in arriving at those costs, (2) determining the most recently experienced costs, and (3) examining recently awarded contracts. Also, for selected systems, we reviewed the status of obligations for previously appropriated funds and the plans to obligate these funds. However, we did not examine each of these aspects for all weapon systems. Rather, we tailored our review of each system to focus on identifying those items that appeared to have the msot potential for reduction.
1992 Army Budget: Potential Reductions to Missile Programs
1991
19 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Logistics Military Facilities & Supplies , Management Practice , Missile Technology , Guided missiles , Army budgets , Reduction , Modification , Antitank missiles , PATRIOT Missiles , STINGER Missiles , HELLFIRE Missiles , TOW Missiles , MLRS(Multiple Launch Rocket System) , ATACMS(Army Tactical Missile System)