In executing its long-range shipbuilding plan, the U.S. Navy is facing financial challenges that require it to evaluate potential lower-cost options for its most-expensive platforms. We examine potential alternatives for replacing later Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (CVNs) as they reach the end of their planned service lives in2030 and beyond. Some in Congress, among others, have criticized the Gerald R. Fordclass nuclear aircraft carriers (USS Gerald R. Ford [CVN 78], USS John F. Kennedy [CVN 79], and USS Enterprise [CVN 80]), which are now in construction or early long-lead procurement, for high acquisition cost, and the Navy has been directed to consider lower-cost alternatives. The study reported here was an effort to consider those alternatives by asking what platform options should be considered, how different platforms would perform in various operational environments, and the costs of alternative platforms. This report provides an unclassified summary of a longer, restricted-distribution companion report.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren