A comparison of the accuracy of visual position measurement in four common subspaces is presented. Principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) and Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD) are examined for their ability to discriminate positions in a 2D visual subspace. The comparison was done with both constant and varying illumination and random occlusion. It is shown that PCA provides very good overall performance compared with more sophisticated techniques such as ICA, FLD, and KPCA, at a reduced computational complexity.
A comparison of subspace methods for accurate position measurement
2004-01-01
381862 byte
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Accurate Measurement Method of the Position of a Buried Line
Online Contents | 1995
|Comparison of Highly Accurate Interpolation Methods
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|Accurate Position Measuring Spacecraft Package
NTIS | 1986
|Comparison of highly accurate interpolation methods
AIAA | 2001
|POSITION MEASUREMENT DEVICE, POSITION MEASUREMENT METHOD, PROGRAM, AND POSITION MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
Europäisches Patentamt | 2016
|