Highlights The maximum spacing of crossing facility is recommended to be 190 m. PS2WT (Pedestrian Signal with 2 min Wait Time) and FOB (Foot-Over Bridge) was preferred over other alternative for crossing. Ordinal logistic regression showed that probability of female pedestrian opting subway was less than male pedestrians. Cost benefit analysis indicated that Net present value of FOB was higher than PS2WT.
Abstract Pedestrian accidents constitute a significant share of total accident victims in urban India. In spite of several efforts put by local authorities, pedestrians continue to cross the road at unauthorised locations in an unsafe manner. The present paper reports an investigation to determine the rational spacing of crossing facilities at midblock sections and identify the optimal type of crossing facility for the prevailing condition considering the perceptions of urban commuters. The rational spacing is determined by analysing the data collected from urban commuters regarding the additional detouring they are ready to accept in order to avail a facility for safe crossing of road. The optimal type of crossing facility is determined considering the preferences of urban commuters and the cost-benefit analysis associated with different facilities. The effect of socioeconomic and trip characteristics of commuters on the response or preference is also investigated. Although, the study has been demonstrated with reference to a corridor in the Kolkata metro city and the results are case-specific, the approach may be applied elsewhere to identify the lacuna in spacing and type of pedestrian crossing facility and to propose suitable improvement measures.
Measures for improving pedestrian crossing facilities based on perceptions of urban commuters: An experience in Kolkata
2021-04-27
9 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Civilising pedestrian road crossing facilities
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|Understanding Urban Commuters: How are Non-SOV Commuters Different from SOV Commuters?
Online Contents | 2000
|Capacity measures for pedestrian crossing movements
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|