AbstractPlanning organizations are increasingly looking to accessibility measures to understand how well the transportation system provides access to employment opportunities. However, the most common type of job accessibility measure employed in planning practice, the cumulative opportunity measure, considers job supply but overlooks competition for jobs. Therefore, the cumulative opportunity measure may not fully capture workers' access to job opportunity.In this paper, we examine four accessibility measures, two of which account for spatial competition and the other two do not, using the Los Angeles metropolitan area as a case study. We find that measures of competitive accessibility have stronger associations with employment than non-competitive accessibility measures. We examine the relationship between residential accessibility and employment for four separate levels of educational attainment, and we find that competitive measures are especially pertinent for population segments with lower educational attainment. Therefore, we recommend competitive accessibility measures to assess the employment opportunity more accurately.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Does competition matter in measures of job accessibility? Explaining employment in Los Angeles


    Beteiligte:
    Merlin, Louis A. (Autor:in) / Hu, Lingqian (Autor:in)

    Erschienen in:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2017-08-20


    Format / Umfang :

    12 pages




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Accessibility measures with competition

    van Wee, Bert | Online Contents | 2001


    Measuring the effects of job competition and matching on employment accessibility

    Pan, Qisheng / Jin, Zhonghua / Liu, Xuejun | Elsevier | 2020


    Employment accessibility and rising seas

    Noland, Robert B. / Wang, Sicheng / Kulp, Scott et al. | Elsevier | 2019