Abstract Introduction Traffic jams, congestion and pollution demand sustainable modes of transport. To increase the appeal of cycling, bicycle-users' perceptions and needs should be acknowledged by decision-makers. However, traditional transport planning mainly focuses on quantitative, infrastructural data. To address this gap, this study explores to what extent decision-makers are aware of cyclists' needs and perceptions. Furthermore, the study compares the assessments about cycling of decision-makers and cyclists in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Methods Qualitative Interviews with 13 cyclists and similarly structured interviews with 6 experts from politics and planning were compared using qualitative content analysis. Two main topics were examined: (1) the reasons for cycling and (2) the perceived environment (built, natural and individually perceived). To integrate the spatial context, the interviewees draw sketch maps which were analyzed and compared using geo-information systems. Results Experts assume that main roads with cycling infrastructure are decisive for fast and safe cycling and cyclists agree with this statement. However, cyclists further refer to the positive effects of green spaces, the experience of the natural environment (e.g. fresh air) as well as the healthy and recreational effect of cycling. Cyclists prefer taking side roads and are prepared to use detours to integrate the natural environment and avoid traffic jams, noise and air pollution – these aspects were rarely acknowledged by decision-makers. Discussion We conclude that urban planners need to involve cyclists' perceptions more explicitly. Integrating cyclists' experiences in planning processes using sketch maps and interviews are beneficial, complementing quantitative approaches to enhance the understanding of cyclist behavior. The findings are essential to stress the importance of participatory approaches in urban planning to promote a sustainable, healthy and environmentally friendly urban development appropriate to citizens' needs.
Highlights Contrasting cyclists' with city planning/policy experts' perspective on cycling. Sketch mapping and qualitative interviews for evaluating cycling quality. Quiet side roads for avoiding pollution and traffic jam as well as experiencing nature important for cyclists. Experts focus on infrastructure and main roads, less on affective motives. Stronger consideration of cyclists' experiences in planning processes.
The planned and the perceived city: A comparison of cyclists' and decision-makers' views on cycling quality
2019-11-15
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Cycling and cyclists in South-East Asia
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|Safety behaviour of cyclists and attitudes to cycling
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: A comparison of perceived crash risk
Online Contents | 2013
|New milling machine planned for aircraft makers
Engineering Index Backfile | 1951
|