Out of many heinous crimes done under Saddam Hussein, few had such disturbing and long-lasting human effects as the use of chemical weapons (CW). In order to serve the interests of justice, such serious crimes of international concern should not go unpunished. Based on the treaty and customary laws applicable in the 1980s, the use of chemical weapons was prohibited under international law. Such prohibition in itself (without explicit criminalization) could be a basis for criminal responsibility of the individuals involved. So, if there were competent international tribunals existing to address such crimes, the tribunals would have no problems in terms of legality. But currently, no international tribunals exist with any link to the Iraq-Iran war in the 1980s. The issue of enforcing international law by domestic courts is thus brought into attention. The article concludes that Iranian courts should have jurisdiction over such incidents. In order for the Iranian judicial forums to get involved in an effective manner, it is suggested that legislation is necessary to get into some coordination with international law.
Use of Chemical Weapons in the Iraq-Iran War under the Perspective of International Criminal Law
2016
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Guerra Iran-Iraq: attacco alla USS Stark
Online Contents | 2008
|Gulf Security and the Iran-Iraq War
NTIS | 1985
|VIEWPOINT - Why Iraq will never give up its worst weapons
Online Contents | 2002
ATTACK ON IRAQ: Europe still worried about weapons of mass destruction
Online Contents | 2003